The following are expcerpts from C. Wright Mills from his essay The Structure of Power in American Society. From Power, Politics, and People - C. Wright Mills NY, Oxford University Press, 1963 p23 "Power has to do with whatever decisions men make about the arrangements under which they live, and about the events which make up the history of their times" "In the modern world, me must bear in mind, power is often not so authoritative as it seemed to be in the edieval epoch: ideas which justify rulers no longer seem so necessary to their exercise of power. At least for many of the great decisions of our time - especially those of an international sort- mass "persuasions" has not been "necessary;" the fact is simply accomplished. p24 "There has, in fact, come about a situation in which many who have lost faith in prevailing loyalties have not acquired new ones, and so pay no attention to politics of any kind. They are not radical, liberal, not conservative, not reactionary. They are inactionary. They are out of it" p25 "I should contend that "men are free to make history," but that some men are indeed much freer than others. "The history of modern society may readily be understood as the story of enlargement and the centralization of the means of power-in economic, in political, and in military institutions." p27 "The power to make decisions of national and internation consequences is now so clearly seated in policitical, military, and economic insitutions that other areas of society seem off to the side and, on occasion, readily subordinated to these" "There is no longer. on the one hand, an economy, and, on the other, a political order, containing a military establishment unimportant to politics and to money-making" "This triangle of power is now a structural fact, and it is the key to any understanding of higher circles in America today. For as each of these domains has concided with the others, as decisions in each have become broader. The leading men of each- the high military, the corporation executives, the political directorate- have tended to come together to form the power elite of America" "The long time tendency of business and the government to become more closely connected has since World War II reached a new point of explicitiness. Neither can now be seen clearly as a distinct world" p28 "The attention of the elite have shifted from domestic problems-centered around the 30's around slump-to international problems" p29 "In so far as the power elite is composed of men of similar origin and education, of similiar career and style of life, their unity may be said to rest upon the fact that they are of similiar social type." p30 - on middle level of power "It is these middle levels that the political journalist and the scholar of politics are most likely to understand and write about-if only because, being mainly middle class themselves, they are closer to them. Moreover these levels provide the noisy content of most "political" news and gossip; the images of these levels are more or less in accord with the folklore of how democracy works; and if the master-image of balance is accepted many intellectuals, especially in their current patrioteering, are readily able to satisfy such political optimism as they wish to feel." p32 "The middle level of politics is not a forum in which there are debated the big decisions of national and international life. Such debate is not carried on by nationally responsible parties representing and clarifying alternative policies. There are no such parties in the United States. More and more, fundamental issues never come to any point or decision before Congress, much less before the electorate in party campaigns" "Such decisions are now regulary by-passed by the Congress, and are never clearly focused issues for public discussion." p36 "In this classic image, the people are presented with problems. They discuss them. They formulate viewpoints. These viewpoints are organized, and they compete. One viewpoint "wins out". Then the people act on this view, or their represenatives are instructed to act it out, and this they promptly do. Such are the classic images of democracy which are still used as working justifications for power in America. We now reconize this description as more a fairy tale than a useful approximation. The issues that now shape man's fate are neither raised nor decided by any public at large. The idea of a society that is at bottom composed of publics is not a matter of fact; it is the proclomation of an ideal, and as well the assertion of a legimation masquerading as fact"