Info-ParaNet Letters Volume 1 Issue 33 Subjects - Re: Bruce Cathie Re: Thomas Bearden Re: Interesting Contradiction Part Ii Re: Info-paranet Newsletter Re: Info-paranet Newsletter Re: Interesting Contradiction Part II Re: Public Opinion --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: paranet!Clark.Matthews Subject: Re: Bruce Cathie Date: 5 Sep 89 23:55:00 GMT Hello Bob. No, I haven't seen the N.Z. file on Quiet Earth...must look in the library. Best, Clark -- Clark Matthews - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!Clark.Matthews INTERNET: Clark.Matthews@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 6 Sep 89 00:09:00 GMT From: paranet!Clark.Matthews Subject: Re: Thomas Bearden Hi Linda. Well, too bad about Dr. Bennewitz. The people at Thunder Labs were very reticent when I called looking for him. Your (or Persinger's) point about the addictive qualities of truly psychotronic technologies is well taken. There was a lot of discussion about "Electronic Brain Stimulation" back in the 60's and 70's -- with Tim Leary in the forefront of the campaign to develop such technologies. So the addictive potential does not surprise me. What's more, IF the human brain does act as a scalar transmitter as a result of normal sensory/motor/thought processes -- and IF it is possible to disarrange or rearrange these neural processes by technical means -- then the potential for permanent derangement or mental illness must exist within these technologies. In other words, a great many people have experimented with scalar emitters and magnetic interferometry -- and quite a few of them have exhibited varying degrees of instability (or worse). What I'm wondering is: Is there a correlation? Either 1.)they're crackers because they believe these technologies exist and work, or; 2.)the technologies exist and work -- but they mess up one's cognitive and thought processes. Which brings me back to Dr. Bennewitz. In "Clear Intent" he {clearly had some mastery of scalar sensor/detector technology, as demonstrated by the minutes of his meeting with U{_SAF officials. It makes one wonder... Of course, if someone ELSE has mastered this technology -- or at least discovered what is necessary to drive someone over the brink -- then the phenomenon takes on a much more sinister cast. What I'm saying is: Whom the MIBs would destroy, they first make mad. Know what you mean about libraries. Don't know what I'd do without the NYPL. Best, Clark -- Clark Matthews - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!Clark.Matthews INTERNET: Clark.Matthews@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 6 Sep 89 00:21:00 GMT From: paranet!Clark.Matthews Subject: Re: Interesting Contradiction Part Ii Hello, Frank. Are you from "down under"? I gather that you must be. I'm curious -- is the Pine Gap base a NORAD facility or something else? You see, NORAD as far as I know is strictly a North American organization. Having read Bruce Cathie's material, I'm not at all surprised that this questionable base is at an antipode of the Bermuda Triangle, but what goes on there? That's the question. You may be interested to know that there's a similar facility -- a so-called tracking facility -- near Andros Island in the Bermuda Triangle. And geomagnetic disturbances and other anomalies are very well known & documented around Andros Island. If memory serves, there is a very well documented instance of a private pilot becoming lost in a fog over Andros Island -- he barely got back to the airfield & lost communications for most of the time he was lost -- but the day was CLOUDLESS and observers on the ground SAW his Cessna meandering aimless ly over Andros Island. Weird, huh? Best, Clark -- Clark Matthews - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!Clark.Matthews INTERNET: Clark.Matthews@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 6 Sep 89 07:16:00 GMT From: paranet!mcorbin Subject: Re: Info-paranet Newsletter Preacher, > As for things of the ParaNet type well I guess you would > just have to live > here to see it for yourself. Welcome to ParaNet! I am certain that you will find something that will strike your fancy....Enjoy the discussions. Mike -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!mcorbin INTERNET: mcorbin@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 6 Sep 89 07:18:00 GMT From: paranet!mcorbin Subject: Re: Info-paranet Newsletter Stephen, Welcome to ParaNet! Glad to see your curiosity brought you here. There are many different kinds of people around here, and I am sure that you will find someone who would like to discuss your interests in the phenomenon. Enjoy the discussions. Mike -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!mcorbin INTERNET: mcorbin@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 5 Sep 89 07:46:18 GMT From: paranet!Linda.Murphy Subject: Re: Interesting Contradiction Part II > Pine Gap, like all NORAD bases are so secretive that you could say > anything about them. But I would still like to have alook at what goes > on. I am sure that a greater portion of what is going on inside, is the product of outside activity.... Whatever is going on in the inside, must be started from the outside somewhere... It is true we can say enough about anything, but get enough people excited about probabilities, and something usually gives... I sorta view this as what could be occuring with the UFO "disinformation".... is it to really draw attention to a particular facility? (Such as John Lear and others invading Nellis), or could it be to undermine the confidence of the public in it's government? May not sound like a whole bunch of people getting all excited about it, but it always winds up being a smaller minority that somehow manages to create quite a ruckus. ( 1:304/1) -- Linda Murphy - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!Linda.Murphy INTERNET: Linda.Murphy@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 5 Sep 89 23:26:17 GMT From: paranet!f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG!Jim.Delton Subject: Re: Public Opinion I say "keep posting the files" !! Also say, establish an "anti-quoting" rule. No more then three quote lines per message. -- Jim Delton - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: ...!scicom!304!1!Jim.Delton INTERNET: Jim.Delton@f1.n304.z1.FIDONET.ORG ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ INFO-PARANET NEWSLETTER ADMIN paranet-request@scicom.alphacdc.com ARTICLE SUBMISSION infopara@scicom.AlphaCDC.COM