Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 376 Tuesday, March 12th 1991 Today's Topics: HYPNOTHERAPIST NEEDED FOR OREGON ABDUCTEE SS433 RED LIGHT SPECIAL Philadelphia meteor 4/5/91 ufo sighting in nh? another "meteor" Haaton stuff, etc. Re: Ss433 (none) Gravitational magnetism Incinerated Village Red Light Special Philadelphia Meteor 4/5/91 Skyline For 91-03-08 Geomagnetic Update ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sheldon.Wernikoff@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (Sheldon Wernikoff) Subject: HYPNOTHERAPIST NEEDED FOR OREGON ABDUCTEE Date: 11 Mar 91 02:16:00 GMT I HAVE BEEN CORRESPONDING WITH AN ABDUCTEE LIVING IN OREGON - PREVIOUSLY NEW MEXICO - WHO IS LOOKING FOR A QUALIFIED HYPNOTHERAPIST NEAR NEWPORT, OREGON TO INVESTIGATE HER AMNESIAC PERIODS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS APPRECIATED.. SHELDON WERNIKOFF 9200 NILES CENTER ROAD SKOKIE, IL 60076-1548 708-677-5154 -- Sheldon Wernikoff - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Sheldon.Wernikoff@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim.Greenen@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Greenen) Subject: SS433 Date: 9 Mar 91 15:48:00 GMT MC> Jim, MC> MC> I have noticed your postings in other echoes about SS433. MC> What is it and what significance does it have to UFO MC> research? MC> MC> Thanks for your reply. MC> MC> Mike MC> MC> --- FD 1.99c MC> * Origin: ParaNet Information Service -- Leading UFO MC> Research Network (1:104/4 Well Mike, from what I've been able to find out from other sources is that this object seems to have the ability to change course and speed. Which means it could be under intelligent control. Or simply a Unidentified Flying object. From what I'd heard is that there is more to SS433 then what the public is being told. If you would like, I will discontinue my discussion on this object in your echo if so desired. 73's ---Jim--- -- Jim Greenen - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Jim.Greenen@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks) Subject: RED LIGHT SPECIAL Date: 9 Mar 91 17:15:01 GMT > Sensational usless information. You're right, ABC presented zippo information. About the red lights. They've been see in the area for quite a while. An old fisherman said "decades." The lights have been seen to move fast, hold still, and slowly move to windward. Rules out balloons, and too fast for a blimp. No other lights, such as running lights, and no sound. I apparently saw one in the early '80's, about 200 miles east of Pensacola. I recall thinking it was rather strange at the time, but many of the descriptions from Pensacola fit what I saw. Dim red light, no other lights, moving slowly southward up high, then moving faster until out of sight. No sound. At the time I'd been very used to seeing mil. jets and Customs/CG choppers at night, and it didn't appear to match any of those. Other lights at Pensacola. A few people have reported seeing fast-moving luminous blue-white globes, sometimes apparently fairly low. jbh -- John Hicks - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks) Subject: Philadelphia meteor 4/5/91 Date: 9 Mar 91 17:19:02 GMT > In my local paper, Robert Gribble, director of the National UFO > Reporting Center, said his investigators questioned a pilot > flying over Maryland at the time of the incident. The pilot said > that he saw the meteor *change direction.* Hmmm.... A post on CI$ quoted the initial AP report as saying that two airline pilots reported (by radio) to the FAA that they saw the thing moving slowly and changing direction over the New York City area. A later AP report didn't mention the pilots but quoted the meteor scenario. We saw a report from LIUFON here about an incident that apparently happened about the same time. Another person on CI$ said that a couple of his employees in NYC told him they saw it *hover*. A little bleep in yesterdays newspaper mentioned another meteor moving east-west over Michigan. Getting odd! jbh -- John Hicks - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks) Subject: ufo sighting in nh? Date: 9 Mar 91 17:20:03 GMT > Hello...i'm wondering if anyone out there has any info on the > "ufo" > sightings that took place on wedsday morning between 2-330 in Maybe connected with the East Coast "meteor" sightings. jbh -- John Hicks - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG (John Hicks) Subject: another "meteor" Date: 9 Mar 91 17:26:04 GMT I have a firsthand report from a retired USMC Colonel (engineer) who saw a "fireball" from the North Carolina Outer Banks in the mid-'50's. The fireball was seen from NC up to Maine, and apparently was reported in many newspapers. He said that what he saw was a brilliant white light that moved from horizon to horizon in about ten seconds in apparently level flight, and was so bright that a distinct shadow was cast by a lit Coleman lantern. He said it didn't leave any trail or have a tail, and that he didn't believe it was a meteor. The witness is definitely a qualified observer. Sounds very similar to the recent "meteor" report. jbh -- John Hicks - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: John.Hicks@f29.n363.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Steve.Rose@p1.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Steve Rose) Subject: Haaton stuff, etc. Date: 9 Mar 91 05:44:14 GMT un> of gay bashing is a volume that has how un> 'Sodomy reduced the immune system' and un> 'AIDS is the last great plague of the un> Earth' or some such items. Talked about un> how there will be concentration camps in un> the US, how we will see stuff like in un> Russia (removing large bills from the un> economy, then going plastic, which may un> happen regardless of who is in charge). This type of crap has been going on since the beginning of recorded history and will continue till the end of time. Most everyone can smell this type of advertising or phoney literature for what it is, right away. Others just take a bit longer to catch on...unless they are simply curious as to how sick a group of individuals can be. No harm in looking an laughing at such nonsense, just to see how little we have all progressed throughout time. But you are right in saying, that the buck stops with one's wallet. Never let them get the edge on ya, by scoring a victory over your hard-earned money. Only through refusing to give into such 'mail order scams' disguised as "revelation information services" can we hit them back where it hurts most. -- Steve Rose - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Steve.Rose@p1.f134.n109.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: mcorbin@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Re: Ss433 Date: 11 Mar 91 10:21:00 GMT In a message to Michael Corbin <03-09-91 08:48> Jim Greenen wrote: >Well Mike, from what I've been able to find out from other >sources is that this object seems to have the ability to >change course and speed. Which means it could be under >intelligent control. Or simply a Unidentified Flying >object. From what I'd heard is that there is more to SS433 >then what the public is being told. If you would like, I >will discontinue my discussion on this object in your echo >if so desired. 73's ---Jim--- By all means, no. Please discuss this in this echo. I am really curious about it. Can you cite some source material for the strange behavior you mention? Thanks for the reply. Mike -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: mcorbin@paranet.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: ecn.purdue.edu!lush Subject: (none) Date: 11 Mar 91 22:22:11 GMT From: lush@ecn.purdue.edu (Gregory B Lush) To Michael Corbin, You posted several articles about solar flare activity in the last newsletter. I have several questions about flares and I was wondering if you could answer them. First, I guess I would ask why you think it was important enough to post. I'm not being critical, just asking. I also read these postings on the NET and found it hard to get anything out of them since I didn't have any experience following the reports. Could you address the following? How often do flares occur? And is frequency related to the eleven year cycle of the sun? What do the class ratings mean? Class M or X? The most recent reports seemed to have many words like 'very,' 'exceptional,' and "major." What was unusual about that alert? What is a typical intensity of a flare and what is exceptional? What is UT (Universal Time?) with respect to EST? One alert had statements like: 'Type II sweep frequency event...' "No sweeps were recorded..." What do these statements mean? What is a coronal mass ejection, and what are its implications? It sounds exciting. What is shock speed? 'S23E90 (or slightly beyond the east limb)' What is the map of sun? What is a flare that is 'optically uncorrelated'? What is a s.f.u. ? What of proton events? I work with solar cells and know that they often suffer their worst radiation damage from protons and especially from solar flares. Are there other implications besides solid state radiation damage? Is the following unusual? + PLEASE NOTE!! If the region(s) responsible for this major flaring + continues to produce major flares over the coming week, potentially high + terrestrial impacts could occur. Persons, organizations, and/or researchers + who might be affected by the major flaring should take note of this and pay + close attention for future major flare alerts and possible terrestrial + impacts (ie. magnetic storming) later this week. It is possible that this + region could quite literally blow itself out before it begins to enter the + area capable of producing terrestrial impacts. More will be known in the + next 24 to 48 hours as the region(s) present themselves for closer + examination. I know this is an awful lot so if you have a reference I can find, that would suffice. Thanks. Greg -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: violet.berkeley.edu!chalmers Subject: Gravitational magnetism Date: 12 Mar 91 07:38:41 GMT From: chalmers@violet.berkeley.edu (John H. Chalmers Jr.) Robert Forward, a physicist specializing in gravitational theory and 'hard SF' writer (Dragon's Egg and sequel), has described an antigravity device consisting of a toroidal coil with an ID of about 100 meters. If the mass of a neutron star were to flow through the windings of the coil every millisecond, the magnetic analog of the gravitational field ('protational' or gravitational magnetic field) would neutralize gravity in the center of the coil. The reason for the enormous masses and velocities required is the low value of the gravitational coupling constant (about 40 orders of magnitude less than the strong nuclear or EM) and the low permeability of space to the field. Physicists at Stanford and elsewhere are planning experiments on a satellite in the next decade to test for the existence of the protational field (as I remember by the precession of orthogonal gyroscopes). Given what is known about electrodynamics and the above, I'm rather skeptical about low power toroidal magnetic fields' causing warps in space-time. However, a working model would go a long way toward convincing me. ---- John -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: astro.dnet.ge.com!CARR Subject: Incinerated Village Date: 12 Mar 91 07:40:12 GMT From: Paul Carr It seems to me that the Kirimukuyu incident could be explained by your usual bloodthirsty types dropping Napalm from planes or choppers. Africa has had its share of this sort of thing. Did I miss something? As to the disappearance of the British regiment, I would like to offer one possible explanation ... Their commander tried to take advantage of the fog bank to try and go around behind his objective. They got lost, got behind enemy lines, and were wiped out. The British suffered immense casualties in that campaign, and not every single man killed could be accounted for. Does that hold water? -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Red Light Special Date: 12 Mar 91 05:56:00 GMT > You're right, ABC presented zippo information. > About the red lights. They've been see in the area for quite a while. > An old fisherman said "decades." > The lights have been seen to move fast, hold still, and slowly move to > windward. Rules out balloons, and too fast for a blimp. No other lights, > such as running lights, and no sound. > I apparently saw one in the early '80's, about 200 miles east of > Pensacola. I recall thinking it was rather strange at the time, but many > of the descriptions from Pensacola fit what I saw. > Dim red light, no other lights, moving slowly southward up high, then > moving faster until out of sight. No sound. At the time I'd been very > used to seeing mil. jets and Customs/CG choppers at night, and it didn't > appear to match any of those. > Other lights at Pensacola. A few people have reported seeing fast- > moving luminous blue-white globes, sometimes apparently fairly low. I am not too sure that we can dismiss balloons yet. I recall that there was something done with balloons there about a year ago as a joke. From what I could see, the red light was not strange, but appeared to be simply a red light not displaying any type of maneuvers which could be considered out of the ordinary. Mike -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Philadelphia Meteor 4/5/91 Date: 12 Mar 91 05:57:00 GMT > A post on CI$ quoted the initial AP report as saying that two airline > pilots reported (by radio) to the FAA that they saw the thing moving > slowly and changing direction over the New York City area. A later AP > report didn't mention the pilots but quoted the meteor scenario. We > saw a report from LIUFON here about an incident that apparently happened > about the same time. > Another person on CI$ said that a couple of his employees in NYC told > him they saw it *hover*. > A little bleep in yesterdays newspaper mentioned another meteor moving > east-west over Michigan. > Getting odd! Anyone having newsclippings are encouraged to forward them here for transcription. Thanks, Mike -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Skyline For 91-03-08 Date: 12 Mar 91 06:00:00 GMT * Forwarded from "Astronomy" * Originally from Mark Kaye * Originally dated 03-09-91 00:54 "Sky and Telescope" SKYLINE 91-03-08 A big story this past week was a brilliant fireball that grazed the Earth's atmosphere early on Wednesday March 6th. Witnesses from West Virginia to Maine saw the dazzling, multi-coloured object at about 02:55 EST. One said it resembled a giant scud missile. An airline pilot near Philadelphia called it the mother of all meteors, well whatever. Reliable sightings note that the blazing fireball took up to 30 seconds to fly across the sky. That makes this an unusually low velocity object, in many ways similar to a blazing daylight fireball that appeared over the Rockies in 1972. No one has yet found any meteorites delivered by Wednesday's passage, and perhaps no one ever will. According to Walt Webb, of Boston's Museum of Science, the witnesses he has spoken to all say the meteor was visible to the east or south thus chances are that any falling pieces dropped in the Atlantic ocean. Conceivably, the object simply slipped in and out of the atmosphere before moving on into interplanetary space. The Moon is now gone from the early evening sky, so you might want to track down comet Levy, 1990c, before it gets to faint to observe. For what it is worth, this week the comet will drag itself back north of the celestial equator for the first time since last August. Here are its positions for zero hours UT and equinox 2000 co-ordinates: On Mar. 10th, R.A. 8:54, Dec. -2.6; on the 13th, 8:48, Dec. -0.7; on the 16th, R.A. 8:42, Dec. 1.1. Two planets are hugging the horizons these days. Mercury is on its way to a nice apparition, later this month and right now, you can find it due west after sunset to the lower right of Venus. Saturn is emerging from dawn's glare in the east and on Mar. 12th, it will be very close to a thin crescent Moon. French astronomers, who have looked at Saturn since its recent conjunction, report that two large ovals are visible along the planets equator. On the evening of the 16th, you will have a chance to spot a very young Moon. Look for it 15 to 30 minutes after sunset to the lower right of Venus and Mercury. The Moon will be only 15 hours old, as seen from the east coast, and 18 hours from the west. Finally, NASA is inviting the public to help pick names for some 4000 new craters and volcanos on Venus that are being discovered by the Magellan orbiter. By established convention, the planet's landforms commemorate notable women, but not political or military figures, who have been dead for at least three years. Send your submissions to: Venus Names, Magellan Project, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, 91109. Include dates of birth and death, and a short rational for your choice. That is it for this week. MK -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Geomagnetic Update Date: 12 Mar 91 06:27:00 GMT * Forwarded from "Space Echo" * Originally from Bev Freed * Originally dated 03-10-91 20:51 /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ POTENTIAL GEOMAGNETIC STORM WARNING /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Issued: 19:00 UT, 09 March Geomagnetic Storm Warning ------------- ATTENTION: Minor geomagnetic storming has begun over the high latitude regions recently. This activity has spread a bit further south than was originally anticipated. Middle latitude geomagnetic activity became active to very active between 14:00 UT and 18:00 UT. Activity at the present time (18:30 UT) has calmed down somewhat, although periods of active to very active conditions over middle latitudes are expected to continue for the next 24 to 48 hours. There is a risk of brief periods of middle latitude MINOR geomagnetic storming. No major storming will occur. Most of the activity should be below minor storm levels. Magnetic K-indices of 4 and 5 are expected over the middle latitudes. Middle latitude magnetic A-indices could reach 32. High latitudes will experience low to moderate intensity minor storming over the next 24 to 48 hours. K-indices of 5 will be dominant. Isolated brief major storming may occur over some locations with estimated K-indices between 5 and 7. High latitude A-indices could exceed 40. Auroral activity will be most intense over the high latitude auroral zone. Some southward migration of the auroral oval is possible over the next 24 to 48 hours. High latitudes will experience mostly moderate auroral activity with some possible bursts of high activity during substorm periods. Northerly middle latitudes will witness low to moderate auroral activity. Central middle latitudes could witness low activity while southerly middle latitudes and low latitudes will not experience any auroral activity. This could change, however, if major flaring continues. The lower latitude limit for observing auroral activity in the U.S. will range between approximately 42 N for the eastern U.S. to 44 N for the western U.S. during the evening hours. No significant auroral storming is expected, although localized active periods could materialize. Polar and auroral radio paths will experience increased fading and absorption due to the increased geomagnetic and auroral activity which has occurred recently. Auroral flutter will dominate polar and high latitudes, particularly during the local evening hours. High and northerly middle latitude VHF auroral backscatter communications may become possible during the late afternoon hours and again near local midnight. A geomagnetic storm alert will be posted if middle latitude magnetic activity surpasses storm level thresholds. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ -- Michael Corbin - via FidoNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@f4.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG ********To have your comments in the next issue, send electronic mail to******** 'infopara' at the following address: UUCP {ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com ADMIN Address infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com {ncar,isis,boulder}!scicom!infopara-request ******************The**End**of**Info-ParaNet**Newsletter************************