Info-ParaNet Newsletters Volume I Number 544 Monday, April 6th 1992 (C) Copyright 1992 Paranet Information Service. All Rights Reserved. Today's Topics: Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs Re: Cable Radio Show Msg The B-2 Ufo Mute Controversy Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs CNN Headline News clip 4/2/92 Orthodox Nazca Reference The Ninevah Number Black Technology... Miami time warp Puzzle/Question NASA completes asteroid workshop studies (Forwarded) Don Ecker and Phil Klass!! Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Linda Bird) Subject: Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs Date: 31 Mar 92 02:52:00 GMT Hi Peggy, Those conferences are way out of my price range. Am thinking of going to the MUFON conf. in July as I could drive over there easily in a day. I ought to come out to Denver and see you and Mike Corbin; could easily do that on the price of one conference ticket! How far are you from Albuquerque (spelled right!!)? And could you attend the July MUFON there? See ya, Linda -- Linda Bird - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Tom.Davis@f201.n350.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Davis) Subject: Re: Cable Radio Show Date: 30 Mar 92 06:40:00 GMT But, but, there's always Seattle. The Goodwill Games almost did us in by showing the entire country what the weather is really like out here. Rats. And we have award-winning TV stations and radio stations, active volcanoes (yes, St. Helens is still active, but the media has lost interest), and we get less rain than New York City does; but we don't broadcast that very much. What better place for a radio show than within the shadow of Mt. Rainier where the modern movement began in 1942? Hmmm, Don? Are you listening? :) -- Tom Davis - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Tom.Davis@f201.n350.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Vladimir.Godic@f6.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Vladimir Godic) Subject: Msg Date: 2 Apr 92 04:31:00 GMT > To: Keith Basterfield, > Keith, have you gotten the msgs. I have sent you recently? Is > Paranet > Research still alive? I've gotten nothing on that net for weeks. > My msg. > was on HumCat and your Australian CEIII cases. Please > acknowledge this > msg.; I will resend if necessary. > Dave Dave, Keith asked me to reply to your message and to confirm that he HAS received your message and replied. If you didn't get it, then there must be something wrong your end. We have no problem with our system here. Regards, Vlad -- Vladimir Godic - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Vladimir.Godic@f6.n1040.z9.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Don Ecker) Subject: The B-2 Ufo Date: 2 Apr 92 10:04:00 GMT Anson Kennedy asked; > Next (obvious) question: > > In which back issues were the articles? Anson, Tony Gonsalves story ran in *UFO Magazine Vol. 5 #3, and Vol. 5 #6. > Could you give me a hint about his research in the meantime? What Gonsalves proposed was that portions of the aircraft were built using recovered disc technology, ie he thought that it could hover. Best; Don -- Don Ecker - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Don.Ecker@p0.f3.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Mute Controversy Date: 2 Apr 92 22:14:00 GMT * Forwarded from "ParaNet General Echo" * Originally from Sheldon Wernikoff * Originally dated 03-31-92 22:22 Peggy... I finally was able to get through to Dr. King this afternoon, and as you previously stated, found him to be most accommodating, informative, and interested in clarifying the cattle mutilation "mystery". His opinion that the mutilations do not represent any "other- worldly" events still stands, and he remains confident that most of the Howe-Altshuler cases are explicable through predation mechanisms. He does not believe that many of the killings are related to cult sacrifice, although he acknowledges the fact that cult killing does occur. The eye wounds and "cookie cutter incisions" Altshuler describes are consistent with what is effected by predatory birds, such as vultures, and represent nothing remarkable. Coyotes and cats often will eat the tongue of a dead cow, which usually hangs out of the mouth. The anal and genital areas are also choice tidbits for the predators. As far as the various microscopic cytological changes Altshuler reports, King stated that wounds made by animals (or himself for that matter) would exhibit similar effects, and that these effects need not be generated solely by high-heat instruments. The "bloodless" corpse also seems to have a more prosaic explanation. Apparently, when the cow dies, the blood is not drained, but the plasma (liquid) portion of the blood is absorbed into the surrounding tissues, causing cellular distention. The solid components of the blood (erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets, etc.) remain in the arteries, veins and capillaries. If you cut into the cow's flesh, or attempt to draw blood, none will flow because the vehicle (plasma) has left the venous system due to osmotic pressure. However, all of the blood constituents are still there in the cow, except for some of the water content. King also stated that many of the cows that were examined were dead for *days*, not freshly killed as often stated by H & A, causing dehydration and subsequent exacerbation of the "bloodless" condition. King indicated that Altshuler, being an M.D., should be aware of this. What really bothers me Peggy, is the fact that many "believers" never even get the opportunity to hear alternative explanations such as King's, because H & A don't present them. IMHO, H & A are not being totally honest with us, but more importantly, they are not being honest with themselves. When I finally asked King why he thought Howe and Altshuler were continuing with their "mutilation circuit", he stated "probably because there's a good buck in it." Unless H & A begin to present a more objective perspective of the 'phenomenon', I tend to agree with King's assessment. How do you feel about all this Peggy? Once again, thanks for supplying the excellent referral. ParaNet has come through again. --Sheldon @ FIDO 1:11/50 -- Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs Date: 2 Apr 92 23:28:00 GMT > How far are you from Albuquerque (spelled right!!)? And could you > attend the July MUFON there? We are about 400 miles from Albuquerque. Would love to see you. Mike -- Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: wam.umd.edu!infinity Subject: CNN Headline News clip 4/2/92 Date: 3 Apr 92 02:20:18 GMT From: Triopedus Psyplovortisle During the 11:30 AM edition of CNN Headline News (not to be confused with the other, main, CNN channel), a 10-15 second clip was done that had something to do with alien abductions. I caught very little of it because the TV volume was too low and I was obstructed by a long counter. It contained, '.....was/were abducted by aliens... ... no reason to believe it did not happen.' Was a new TREAT report released? Was another implant examined? Has a major public official, scientist, or psychologist just come forward admitting having been abducted? Did CNN pick up on a conference being held of the phenomenon? I believe they once mentioned a UFO symposium or conference being held maybe a year ago. Any ideas? More galactic thoughts from: Amicitia Subjugat Omnia Hweohthte... (Hwe-oath-T) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- David E. Coleman infinity@wam.umd.edu 8125 48th Ave, Apt. 612 College Park, MD 20740 1-(301)-474-7424 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: wam.umd.edu!infinity Subject: Orthodox Nazca Reference Date: 3 Apr 92 05:04:46 GMT From: David E. Coleman For those of you interested in the Nazca lines, I present to you the 'orthodox' non-Atlantean non-UFO conventional interpretation that I found listed somewhere recently, I forget where. 'The Nazca Lines: Patterns in the Desert' Archaeology, 39:4 (July-August, 1986), pp. 32-39. I have yet to check it out yet myself, but I believe it is safe to assume for now that this publication offers the conventional interpretation. In what I have read in books, the conventional interpretation is based on evidence that the symbols in the desert resemble those in the surrounding ancient cultures. Ah, now I remember, the _Archaeology_ article discusses the view that the geometry in the lines can be created without significant land geometry technology. Personally, I think it would be a big stretch to say this is so, and it is just one of hundreds of similar stretches (the hauling and positioning of Easter Island statues, the enormous 'brick' at Baalbek, the Piri Reis maps, etc, that little skeptical explanations (that is 'litter,' not little.) The Lubaantun crystal skull, the granite spheres of Central America supposedly caused by something like subterranean acid weathering, in spite of toolmarks, etc... I believe I got the _Archaeology_ reference from the 1990 Art & Archaeology Abstracts. More galactic thoughts from: Amicitia Subjugat Omnia Hweohthte... (Hwe-oath-T) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- David E. Coleman infinity@wam.umd.edu 8125 48th Ave, Apt. 612 College Park, MD 20740 1-(301)-474-7424 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: wam.umd.edu!infinity Subject: The Ninevah Number Date: 3 Apr 92 05:05:27 GMT From: David E. Coleman I think I read about a c.15 digit number beginning with 19 that was found in Sumeria. I think I read about this in TWELFTH PLANET, by Sitchin, but I am not sure. If anyone knows of this number and can find a reference for me to check (page number?) without it being much trouble, I would quite appreciate it. The reason why I ask is that the Spirit Guides of Ruth Montgomery mention in her books a similar number that exists 'in Ninevah' and represents part of a lost understanding of geometry that led to things such as the Great Pyramid. Ruth Montgomery does not mention that such a number has been found to exist. It is a statement that such a number could be found. I can't remember how many digits her Guides say there are in the number. Thanks in advance. More galactic thoughts from: Amicitia Subjugat Omnia Hweohthte... (Hwe-oath-T) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- David E. Coleman infinity@wam.umd.edu 8125 48th Ave, Apt. 612 College Park, MD 20740 1-(301)-474-7424 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Jim.Graham@f13.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Jim Graham) Subject: Black Technology... Date: 2 Apr 92 22:00:01 GMT I found this on UseNet, newsgroup "sci.space" today. -------------------------CUT HERE--------------------- From: PHARABOD@FRCPN11.IN2P3.FR Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: U.S. black programs Message-ID: Date: 1 Apr 92 23:04:05 GMT AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, March 9, 1992 - "Black World" Engineers, Scientists Encourage Using Highly Classified Technology for Civil Applications - William B. Scott/Los Angeles: ''A small fraction of "black world" engineers and scientists are encouraged by recent government commitments to open intelligence agency files, and congressional threats to curtail funding for some highly classified projects. Such chilling prospects normally would be viewed with alarm by all who get paychecks from U.S. intelligence agencies, but a few technical personnel see opportunity instead of gloom. This minority hopes issues raised over the last two years are bearing fruit now, and might push some black technology into the open eventually. In voicing their view, this small group of scientific professionals dared to break a code of silence that rivals the Mafia's, and several individuals claim they have suffered accordingly. Two said they can prove their civil rights were blatantly abused - always in the name of security - either to keep them quiet or to prevent their leaving the loosely structured, yet highly controlled R&D community. "Once you're in, they don't let you go," an engineer said. Many dedicated "spooks" undoubtly went into a defensive crouch when Robert M. Gates, director of the Central Intelligence Agency, announced last month that some CIA files would be opened. Openness is anathema to the intelligence professional; it defies all Cold War rules of business. But the world has changed, and Gates realized that CIA and its sister agencies must adapt. Within days of Gate's announcement, several congressmen declared open season on black programs they believed were unnecessary since the Soviet Union disbanded (AW&ST Mar. 2, p. 62). Proponents of "deep black" programs point to the lessons of history, noting that dictators and tyrants with dreams of world domination have popped up repeatedly. And when that happens, the U.S. must have a technological arsenal capable of stomping out the threat, they argue. The nation's "silver bullets" are best developed in the black, where neither friend nor foe knows they even exist, let alone how effective they are. Opponents of the status-quo, keep-it-all-classified school see a different "new world order" emerging. These engineers, scientists, technicians and aircraft mechanics believe that U.S. *economic* national security is more at risk now than military security. One way to combat economic threats to each citizen's standard of living is to release some of the secret technology already developed at taxpayer expense, they maintain. One scientist identified several "black world" breakthrough that, he believes, have both military and commercial potential. The technologies include: # Very sensitive infrared sensors that do not require cryogenic cooling. The researcher claimed that, by reducing IR sensor thermal noise through "electrostatic heat transfer" techniques, today's best IR array could operate at sensitivities "several orders of magnitude better than is possible with cryogenic cooling". Environmental monitoring satellites - as well as strategic defense sensors on Brilliant Pebbles and Brilliant Eyes spacecraft - could use this technology to extend the on-orbit life of infrared sensors indefinitely. Currently, the operational life of an IR space sensor is limited by the amount of cryogenic cooling material available. # Instantly altering the thermal equilibrium of a large optical lens or mirror through electrostatic "bulk cooling" methods. The result is analogous to that attained with phase conjugate optics in telescopes or imaging devices employing an elastic-type mirror. "We spent a lot of time in the [1980s] developing a micro-processor interface to a high-voltage power supply ... to control optical arrays," he said. "The results were absolutely astounding". # Using sensitized random access memory (RAM) to detect or transmit low levels of near and far-infrared energy. When incorporated into a feedback system for temperature stabilization, the RAM could be used as "an esoteric IR detector that is simple and reliable," he claimed. # Low-observable ceramics made from powdered, depleted uranium. The resulting dielectric material has approximately 92% the bulk density of depleted uranium, but is about 20 times harder. So far, the ceramic has been demonstrated in a "stealth artillery shell" that cannot be detected by radar. Although the ceramic is of great interest to the U.S. Army, "black world" power struggles over ownership of its manufacturing process is preventing the material's broad application. # Short-pulse Doppler radar (SPDR) - which may be the black world's term for ultra-wideband radar (UWB) (AW&ST Dec. 4, 1989, p. 38). One black-world researcher claimed an over-the-horizon SPDR operating at 50 kw. output power, transmitting a short pulse with a duty cycle of approximatively 0.003, could detect air vehicles 2,500 naut. mi. away in all weather conditions. The receiver employed a "Bragg cell channelizer", he said. However, the capability of SPDR to also detect stealthy vehicles has kept the technology in the limbo since the mid-1980s. "Anybody who brought it up at [a company] got his nose cut off," the scientist said. Although he was not familiar with the bitter controversy over UWB since 1989, he said the earlier suppression of SPDR "was absolutely criminal, because any stealth technology stood out like a sore thumb when hit with short-pulse Doppler" (AW&ST Oct. 21, 1991, p 22; Nov. 19, 1990, p. 18). Engineers working on highly classified programs cited other technologies that appeared to this editor as only military related. They said that - if the principles were widely understood - though, there would be definite commercial applications. One was a "thermal signature masking technology ... which is used on the B-2 [stealth bomber]," an engineer said. "Basically, it's an electrostatic heat transfer phenomena that charges the jet engine exhaust stream to disperse the heat - by a factor of about 800. It does a remarkable job of altering the thermal signature." He said the same basic technology, used in wing leading edges, can reduce a flying vehicle's radar cross section (RCS) by masking thermal signatures created by aerodynamic perturbations of the air. "The radar signature of an incoming warhead can be reduced to less than 10%" of its normal value, the engineer said. "We found that radar cross section has a lot to do with aerodynamics and turbulence - past certain speeds." Electrostatic field-generating techniques in the B-2's wing leading edges may help reduce its RCS. The bomber's leading edges posed a particularly challenging production problem on the first aircraft, and may have been the source of diminished results during early stealth flight tests. In 1968, Aviation Week reported that Northrop was evaluating "electrical forces to condition the air flowing around an aircraft at supersonic speeds" to reduce drag, heating and sonic boom effects. The findings were promising enough to justify funding of additional research (AW&ST Jan. 22, p. 21). By negatively ionizing air molecules ahead of an aircraft, then charging the nose to the same polarity, an electrostatic field was formed. The field tended to repel or alter the molecules' path as the aircraft approached, according to the article. If the "black world" actually has developed feasible ways to reduce airframe drag substantially with controlled electrostatic fields, commercial aircraft manufacturers and airlines should be campaigning mightily for the technology. The potential fuel and cost savings for just American, United and Delta would be staggering. A scientist said other, more dramatic, classified technologies are applicable to lasers, aircraft control and propulsion. However, the scientists and engineers were especially hesitant to discuss these projects. One said they are "very black. Besides, it would take about 20 hr. to explain the principles, and very few people would understand them anyway." Whether or not black technology will be released in the near future or not will depend more on political power wielded in Washington than the recommendations of dissident "insider" factions. It appears that most within the intelligence research and development community are highly skeptical of even Gates' born-again approach, despite the high hopes of openness proponents. Defense Secretary Richard B. Cheney said there was no near-term plan to declassify technology now trapped in the "black world". He said the need to maintain a qualitative edge over potential adversaries "always will take precedence" over economic competitiveness issues (AW&ST Feb. 17, p. 17). Whether that status-quo posture will stand in face of intense Japanese and European competition during a presidential election year is yet to be determined - especially when U.S. and allied contractor executives are scrambling anxiously for ways to turn defense technology into commercial profits.'' -----------------------------------END-------------------------------- -- Jim Graham - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Jim.Graham@f13.n1012.z9.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: wam.umd.edu!infinity Subject: Miami time warp Date: 3 Apr 92 21:40:42 GMT From: David E. Coleman Information --> Reference --> Needed. +From a video on the Bermuda Triangle, I learned of a plane that landed at Miami with everyone's watches approximately ten minutes slow. The plane had disappeared from radar screens for ten minutes at point. My friend tells me such an incident is covered in Time-Life Books' _Mysteries of the Unknown_, which I do not have. My question is does anyone know of a reference I can find (and page number?) that covers this event? Thanks in advance. More galactic thoughts from: Amicitia Subjugat Omnia Hweohthte... (Hwe-oath-T) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- David E. Coleman infinity@wam.umd.edu 8125 48th Ave, Apt. 612 College Park, MD 20740 1-(301)-474-7424 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: wam.umd.edu!infinity Subject: Puzzle/Question Date: 3 Apr 92 21:41:02 GMT From: David E. Coleman Puzzlement/Question: The below are one dimensional distributions of objects in a theoretical universe where there is no limit on particle size. Assume each line is of objects of infinitesimal depths and widths but variable lengths. Assume that there is a whole range of such lines, not just lines 1,2,3,4,5,6, but also an infinite number of possible such lines in between, to make a smooth distribution of possible lines of objects. 1----------------------------------- <-- This line should have no gaps 2----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- because it is a limiting case 3-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5................................... 6----------------------------------- <-- This line also should have no gaps since it also is a limiting case My question: Which line above has the highest entropy, and which has the lowest? Disorder and entropy are no one in the same, as physicists try to correct us (i.e the process of evolution on Earth has a decrease in disorder but an increase in entropy.) So, I also ask, which line above has the greatest order, and which has the least? The reason why I ask is I am wondering about the nature of Form, one (one solid line,) infinity (infinite number of infinitesimal particles infinitesimally spaced,) chaos, and whether or not I can properly make a circle as below: (6)1 5 2 4 3 More galactic thoughts from: Amicitia Subjugat Omnia Hweohthte... (Hwe-oath-T) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- David E. Coleman infinity@wam.umd.edu 8125 48th Ave, Apt. 612 College Park, MD 20740 1-(301)-474-7424 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: ns-mx.uiowa.edu!jrblack Subject: NASA completes asteroid workshop studies (Forwarded) Date: 4 Apr 92 04:42:13 GMT From: James Roger Black In sci.space.news on Usenet News, yee@trident.arc.nasa.gov (Peter E. Yee) posted the following article: |> Michael Braukus |> Headquarters, Washington, D.C. March 31, 1992 |> (Phone: 202/453-1549) |> |> RELEASE: 92-43 |> |> NASA COMPLETES ASTEROID WORKSHOP STUDIES |> |> |> NASA today presented Congress with summaries of |> workshop studies on detecting Earth-orbit-crossing asteroids |> and determining how to deal with such threats. The two |> workshops were in response to a congressional request included |> in the Fiscal Year 1991 NASA authorization bill. |> |> The NASA-sponsored Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop |> judged asteroids with diameters 1 km or larger the most |> dangerous objects in terms of potential for causing catastrophic |> global effects on Earth. Impacts of such asteroids are extremely |> rare and can be detected with current ground-based technology, |> most likely decades in advance of any collision. |> |> The workshop's proposed detection plan builds on research |> programs that NASA has funded for a number of years. The |> plan calls for a coordinated international network of specialized |> ground-based telescopes for detecting Earth-approaching |> asteroids. |> |> The Near-Earth-Object Interception Workshop was hosted by |> the Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory in |> January 1992. Participants at this three-day workshop |> discussed various schemes for preventing an asteroid from |> colliding with Earth. |> |> |> Editors Note: |> |> General summaries of these two reports can be obtained |> from the NASA Headquarters Newsroom by calling 202/453- |> 8400. The detailed findings of the Detection Workshop will be |> available from the NASA Newsroom on April 2, 1992. The |> detailed findings and technical papers presented at the |> Interception Workshop will be available from the Los Alamos |> National Laboratory, 505/667-7000, in the summer of 1992. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Roger Black roger-black@uiowa.edu Disclaimer: My employer doesn't even know I have any opinions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Corbin) Subject: Don Ecker and Phil Klass!! Date: 4 Apr 92 02:47:00 GMT On April 24, 1992, MICAP (Multi-national Investigations Cooperative on Aerial Phenomena), in conjunction with ParaNet Information Service, will sponsor an illustrated forum on contrasting viewpoints within the UFO research community. This forum will be moderated before a live audience with questions following the presentation. The guests will be Don Ecker, Research Director for UFO Magazine and a long-standing contributor of ParaNet, and Phil Klass, avionics editor (retired) for Aviation Weekly and Space Technology, and known among the UFO research community as an avid detractor of the ETH (Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis). Ecker will demonstrate that the phenomena has a basis in reality and that it has potential implications for possible non-prosaic explanations, whereas Klass will demonstrate a prosaic/earthly explanation for mysterious and seemingly inexplicable UFO incidents. The "square-off" will begin at 7:00 P.M., at the Denver North Holiday Inn Holidome at I-25 and 120th Avenue. The title of the presentation is UFOs? Modern Myth, Manifest Technology, or ...? This will be an interesting exchange of ideas and information and is expected to attract skeptics, believers and the intellectually curious. For ticket inforamtion, please contact MICAP at (303)431-8796. Hotel accomodations are available at reasonable rates. -- Michael Corbin - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Michael.Corbin@p0.f428.n104.z1.FIDONET.ORG -------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG (Linda Bird) Subject: Re: 92 Ufo Con-colospgs Date: 4 Apr 92 03:43:00 GMT Hi Mike, Any chance of your attending the July MUFON in New Mexico? I'd love to meet you and Peggy and the other Denverites. Denverians. Denvertons. :-) Linda -- Linda Bird - via ParaNet node 1:104/422 UUCP: !scicom!paranet!User_Name INTERNET: Linda.Bird@f100.n1010.z9.FIDONET.ORG ******************************************************************************** For permission to reproduce or redistribute this digest, contact: DOMAIN Michael.Corbin@paranet.org UUCP scicom!paranet.org!Michael.Corbin ********To have your comments in the next issue, send electronic mail to******** 'infopara' at the following address: UUCP {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!infopara DOMAIN infopara@scicom.alphacdc.com For administrative requests (subscriptions, back issues) send to: UUCP {ncar,isis,csn}!scicom!infopara-request DOMAIN infopara-request@scicom.alphacdc.com To obtain back issues by anonymous ftp, connect to: DOMAIN ftp.uiowa.edu (directory /archives/paranet) Mail to private Paranet/Fidonet addresses from the newsletters: DOMAIN firstname.lastname@paranet.org UUCP scicom!paranet.org!firstname.lastname ******************The**End**of**Info-ParaNet**Newsletter************************